Join PASS4ALL - 
  The Email Communications on Yahoo Groups !

July 6, 2009

PASS/FAA Internet Usage MOA

See the unsigned Memorandum of Agreement pertaining to PASS Computers and the FAAs' Internet policy.

6/4/09

Don't Shoot Me - I'm Only the Piano Player !!!

WASHINGTON (AP) - A federal safety inspector assigned to the airline involved in an air crash that killed 50 people in upstate New York in February warned of safety problems at the airline a year before the accident.

An attorney for Federal Aviation Administration inspector Christopher Monteleon said he reported problems with the flight testing program at Colgan Air of Manassas, Va., for its newly acquired Bombardier Dash 8-Q400s in January 2008. That's the same type of plane that crashed Feb. 12 near Buffalo Niagara International Airport.

Among the problems Monteleon reported was that the Colgan test pilot exceeded the permissible speed limit for the Dash 8 and had difficulty properly landing the plane.

Test pilots typically are an airline's most skillful pilots and are expected to train other pilots on how to fly new aircraft.

After Colgan, a regional air carrier, complained to the FAA about Monteleon, his FAA supervisor reassigned him to desk work and ordered him to have no further contact with the airline, his attorney, Debra Katz, said.

When Monteleon continued to press for action on safety concerns at Colgan and what he alleged was a cozy relationship between the agency and the airline, he was transferred or reassigned three more times, Katz said.

In March, Monteleon had a confrontation with an FAA attorney and was placed on administrative leave by the agency, Katz said. Monteleon told The New York Times, which first reported on his complaints Wednesday, that agency officials accused him of menacing the attorney. Katz said in a draft letter to FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt that it was Monteleon, 64, a former pilot and 40-year veteran of the aviation industry, who felt threatened.

Monteleon has filed a complaint with the federal Office of Special Counsel, which investigates whistleblower complaints, Katz said. He has also been interviewed by the Transportation Department's Office of Inspector General, the agency's internal watchdog, Katz said. Brian A. Dettelbach, a spokesman for the inspector general, declined to comment.

FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown declined to discuss personnel actions taken involving Monteleon. She said his complaints about safety violations at Colgan were investigated by a special FAA team, which found some record-keeping and other problems but no violations of safety regulations.

"The bottom line was they didn't find any major regulatory issues," Brown said.

A spokesman for Colgan didn't return a phone call from The Associated Press late Wednesday.

Monteleon has been barred from entering any Transportation Department building or property and has been unable to retrieve documents in his office computer at the FAA that support his allegations, Katz said.

Monteleon first raised safety concerns about record-keeping and other problems at Colgan in 2004 when he was the principal inspector assigned to the airline, Katz' letter said. He was later reassigned to a runway safety office, where he also complained about the way the agency was recording safety incidents. He subsequently was demoted and reassigned to Colgan to keep tabs on their new aircraft program, the letter said. It was after that that Monteleon accompanied Colgan pilots testing the Dash 8.

"This is years of raising concerns about Colgan, from the training program to a failure to document maintenance problems," Katz said. "I think this a classic case of shoot the messenger."

Aviation safety consultant Jack Casey said that if Monteleon's complaints about the testing of the Dash 8 are correct - especially if a pilot significantly exceeded the aircraft manufacturer's specified speed for the plane - they are very serious.

"It's not unusual that you have a few little teething problems (when testing a new plane), but what he's describing goes way beyond that," Casey said.

The National Transportation Safety Board held a three-day hearing last month into safety issues raised by crash of Continental Express Flight 3407, including pilot training and fatigue. Testimony at the hearing showed Colgan, which operated the flight for Continental, didn't provide pilots hands-on training on a key cockpit safety system.

Testimony also indicated the flight's captain and co-pilot made a series of critical errors as they neared the Buffalo airport. The Dash 8 experienced an aerodynamic stall that sent it plunging into a house below. All 49 people aboard and one man in the house were killed.

The board hasn't reached a conclusion on the cause of the crash.


5/27/09

HOUSE PASSES FAA REAUTHORIZATION BILL

PASS Successfully Thwarts Attempts to Weaken Critical Safety Language

On May 21, the House passed the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2009 (H.R. 915) by a vote of 277-136. The bill, which contains many provisions critical to PASS members, authorizes $70 billion for the FAA through FY 2012 with $38.9 billion for FAA operations, $13.4 billion for facilities and equipment (F&E), $16.2 billion for the Airport Improvement Program (AIP), and $1.35 billion for research, engineering and development. Since introduction of the bill in February, PASS has worked with lawmakers to ensure the incorporation of language important to PASS members. As a result of PASS's efforts, the bill passed by the House includes language regarding the following:

In addition, PASS was successful in blocking attempts to weaken the language regarding safety oversight of FAA-certificated foreign repair stations. The language in the bill requires that all certificated foreign repair stations be inspected at least twice a year by an FAA inspector and that all workers working on U.S. aircraft at foreign repair stations be drug and alcohol tested. PASS had launched an extensive effort in response to endeavors aimed at altering these requirements depending on the status of international agreements. By emphasizing that FAA inspectors should be able to inspect FAA-certificated foreign repair stations regardless of any agreement, PASS convinced lawmakers that this language is essential to protecting aviation safety.

ACTION ITEM: The Senate is expected to introduce its bill in the coming weeks. PASS members are encouraged to reach out to their senators to discuss the legislation and emphasize the importance of addressing issues of importance to PASS members.

Download and Mail a copy of this Thank You letter if your Representative was one of the ones that voted "Yea" for H.R. 915. 
See how your Congressional Representative voted
Find the address for your Congressperson at the above link also.

3/19/09

3/1/09

As suspected, the FAA will appeal Arbitrator Das decision concerning Article 41, but PASS believes our victory will remain, and the FAA will pay nonetheless.

Also,
The full subject matter of the FAA Reauthorization in PDF Format is available here. The Website is located here, and in particular, look at the  Full Summary of Subject Matter  pages 12 and 13.

2/17/09

BREAKING NEWS !!!

Arbitrator Das sustained PASS's national grievance concerning the Agency's unilateral decision to no longer be bound by Article 41, Section 4, of the Parties' CBA. Arbitrator Das ruled in PASS's favor on every main issue and imposed the remedy requested by PASS in its post-hearing brief. The Agency was found to have breached the CBA as well as having committed a ULP under the Statute. The Agency was ordered: 1. to cease and desist refusing to recognize and enforce Article 41, Section 4; 2. to make whole all employees adversely affected by the Agency's repudiation through the payment of back pay; and 3. to post a written notice to all employees.
The Agency has 30 days in which to file an appeal (exceptions) from the arbitrator's decision. It is unknown at this time whether the Agency will file an appeal.
In the meantime, employees who have been involuntarily assigned off on their in lieu of days should continue to file grievances at the local level since the grievances will be used for identifying employees who are entitled to receive back pay under this decision. 
See the entire arbitration article here